Does commitment to rehabilitation influence the clinical outcome of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty study 2010
|
Does commitment to rehabilitation influence the clinical outcome of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty study 2010 Updated 3/23/2010 |
| The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether compliance and rehabilitative efforts were predictors of early clinical outcome of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was utilized to collect information from 147 resurfacing patients, who were operated on by a single surgeon, regarding their level of commitment to rehabilitation following surgery. Patients were followed for a mean of 52 months (range, 24 to 90 months). Clinical outcomes and functional capabilities were assessed utilizing the Harris hip objective rating system, the SF-12 Health Survey, and an eleven-point satisfaction score. A linear regression analysis was used to determine whether there was any correlation between the rehabilitation commitment scores and any of the outcome measures, and a multivariate regression model was used to control for potentially confounding factors. Results: Overall, an increased level of commitment to rehabilitation was positively correlated with each of the following outcome measures: SF-12 Mental Component Score, SF-12 Physical Component Score, Harris Hip score, and satisfaction scores. These correlations remained statistically significant in the multivariate regression model. Conclusions: Patients who were more committed to their therapy after hip resurfacing returned to higher levels of functionality and were more satisfied following their surgery. Author: David MarkerThorsten SeylerAnil BhaveMichael ZywielMichael Mont Credits/Source: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2010, 5:20 |