Hi
There is a large amount of disagreement among orthopedic surgeons about hip resurfacing. Many are just plain - ill informed. Others are not skilled enough to learn the more difficult procedure. So there are many more that wlll bad mouth hip resurfacing than support it at this time. Here are 3 experienced hip resurfacings surgeons answer to correct the wrong information he is giving you
http://www.surfacehippy.info/faqsmallheadneckration.phpI went to 4 orthos and paid them each $200 each to listen to them bad mouth hip resurfacing and warn me - you will be sorry.
You should listen to a doctor that does both hip resurfacing and THR. Then they have the experience in both and have an unbiased view.
I would believe your original orthopedic surgeon since he is experineced. Your husband is very young at 51 and should have the bone conserving hip resurfacing if possible.
Hip resurfacing is newer than THR, but I even have stories from people that have had theirs 10 or 15 years now. It is not new overseas. My doctor has been doing them since 1998 along with many others.
You just need to do some more research to understand that the doctor is not giving you the correct info. Why don't you ask your original surgeon the same question??? Tell him what the other doctor told you and listen to his answer. He will have a good one. He has 150 happy patients and there are many with thousands of happy patients.
Many of us have been in your situation having doctors tell us - you will be sorry. We choose not to listen to them since the don't have experience in hip resurfacing.
It is up to you, but in your heart if you feel you want resurfacing - then find information to support your decision. You original doctor would be a great resource.
Your husband is young. He could easily require a revision sometime during his life and with hip resurfacing, he will have his whole femur bone left. I was 61 and felt I was too young for a THR.
I hope that page I gave you to read will help.
Pat