Hi Mike
I thought I would spit your post out to start a new conversation about the cement issue.
Here are some of the experienced surgeons opinions
http://www.surfacehippy.info/faqcementcomponents.phpEven Dr. Gross admits he does not know the answer until he has done enough and eventually finds out what is best.
I don't think the THR cementless can compare since there is a really long stem that is forced into along drilled hole in the femur bone. Lots of surface for the bone to heal to. In hip resurfacing, there is only the small stem and the bottom of the cap. I am not medically trained at all and just don't know that much about it technically.
I have read many long, long emails about peoples opionions and engineers opinions. But none are doctors or medically trained. So all the talk is just that - talk.
Personally, I would stick with cemented since there are so many sucessful hip resurfacings with cement. I will say, however, if doctors don't try new things - then we never get new methods.
A lot depends on each persons view. I go with what is old and proven. However, when I had my BHR, it was not even approved in the US by the FDA. So I was experimenting according to most US doctors.
THis is something each person will have to make up their own mind about and feel good about their own decision.
Pat