Not to be confused with Harding anterior approach. The Smith Peterson approach uses a specialized operating table and allows for hip replacement or resurfacing without the cutting or sectioning of any muscle.
Recovery is reported to be quicker with no limitations on hip movement, almost immediate ability for full weight bearing, potential better blood flow retention to the femural head, and much reduced risk of dislocation.
I'm in the process of preparing for the inevitable for my hip. I think I can hold off for another season or two as I have no noted femural degradation yet and do not have any lifestyle limitations but after two consulations with orthopedic surgeons who specialize in the hip I know I will need a prosthesis. In that time I want to get it right and learn as much as I can.
I understand the benefits of the posterior approach vs. the common anterior approach (Harding), particularly for active younger patients like myself, but this Smith Peterson approach is looking more and more attractive as unlike the posterior approach no muscles are detached vs. the posterior approach where short rotators are detached and repaired.
Is anyone familiar with this technique or had a resurfacing done via this approach.
Thanks