Hi Keith
I am a little biased since I had Dr. De Smet do my hip resurfacing March 2006. I did not have insurance and could not afford surgery in the US. I could have gotten a free or almost free THR, but I did not want that. I choose Dr. De Smet because of all the reading I had done on the Yahoo surface hippy discussion group. I felt he was one of the best in the world. I was 61, female and had a loss of bone density. I wanted the most experienced surgeon to make sure everything would be OK. If I had insurance, I would still have choosen De Smet. Others have choosen Dr. Bose in India who is also one of the best. Some people have had their insurance cover their surgery with De Smet. You normally have to pay up front, then are reimbursed later.
Since you are also a little bit older, I would choose a very experienced surgeon. Many people still like Dr. Amstutz even though he is getting a little older also. They still swear by him.
I personally think people have quicker recoveries with the overseas doctors because they are not as conservative as the US doctors. They have done hundreds or even several thousands like De Smet and know what to expect. They also don't have to worry about being sued like the US doctors.
I can't say enough for De Smet. But others will swear by their docs too. I was with 8 others in Belgium and we all had very easy and fast recoveries. I was the slowest since I was the oldest. I was on one crutch at 4 days and none at 4 weeks. None of us had any great swelling or bruising which many people using the newer surgeons seem to have. I personally think it is the great surgical technique of the doctor. Dr. Bose patients also have similar recoveries. Some of the people with the US docs have had that kind of recovery, but it is not as common.
People can argue day and night on the Yahoo group about who is the best - but I think most would put De Smet, Bose, Gross along with Amstutz and Mr. McMinn at the top. Of course, that is just opinion. But just experience goes a long ways and De Smet has over 2700 hip resurfacings to date.
I don't think about my hip any more. I really didn't even 1 year out. My incision itched for a long time and still itches sometimes. I had some clunking because my muscles were lose and still have it occasionaly when I sit and move a certain way. It does not hurt, just is noticable at times. I did not take any heavy pain meds after I left the hospital. I just took Advil for sore muscles. Your muscles are sore along with the incision, but does not normally cause any great pain. It is uncomfortable and feels strange - but not pain like before the surgery.
I think you should get an email consultation from De Smet, Bose and Gross. Maybe anyone else you think would be good and then make up your mind. You will get a feeling for who you want to go to. I wanted De Smet from the time I started to read about the surface hippies that used him, but that was before the FDA approval. so there were a lot fewer docs to choose from.
Hip Resurfacing is definitely the best option for returning to the sports you love
http://www.surfacehippy.info/athletes.php Check out the athletes.
You might be lucky as I hope I am and never need a revision for the rest of your life. However, if you do, at least with a hip resurfacing you have a whole femur bone left for the docs to give you a thr. I always think that is the best reason to start with a hip resurfacing.
Again, I have no pain or numbness in my hip. The only thing that reminds me is the scar from the incision which for ladies in Belgium is all stitches. No staples. You will have waterproof bandages and do water PT a couple days after surgery. The Belgium experience is wonderful and the De Smet team is just great. If you do some reading on the Yahoo group there are several people just recently in Belgium. You can read how well they are doing and how they have no pain.
I hope that helps some. Let me know if I can help with any more info.
Pat in Ohio
3/15/06 LBHR De Smet