Hi Mac,
I think that Spencer really did a better job of clarifying my thoughts than I could have, but since you asked me, I will see if I can answer without confusing what Spencer said so well.
When we say that the two parts are held "in constant contact" by healed muscles and ligaments, this is with the understanding that there is a very thin film of synovial fluid between them. This is as opposed to the two parts actually separating enough so that there is a space, that allows a clunking feeling when they come back in contact. This film layer is what allows the parts to move while still "in constant contact" without creating excessive wear. It is just like in any engine with MOM parts: You generally want the parts to be in constant contact, with a film of oil providing lubrication. For example, one of the roles of piston rings is to maintain constant contact with the cylinder walls, so that the piston is not just banging around in there. If some parts do not stay in contact, you can start hearing some banging in the engine as they lose and regain contact.
Spencer did a great job of explaining my unscientific use of the terms "metal ions", vs "metal debris". Metal ions are microscopic and something that all MOM joints will produce, hopefully at low levels. Metal debris is something that I think of as being on a larger scale, and can be seen in the surrounding tissue. Cases that show large amounts of metal debris often involve prosthesis that show visible wear patterns that have visibly altered the shape of the prosthesis from excessive wear, usually attributed to poor implant positioning, or in some cases attributed to poor fluid film lubrication due to implant positioning or design.
My comment about warming up is an image that I have that is probably even less scientific, but here it is. When a car sits for awhile, the oil drains off of the moving parts, leaving them with little or no lubrication when you first start the engine. Prior to the development of modern oil additives, it was often believed that the most wear in a well maintained engine happened in the first few moments when the engine was started up, before the oil circulated through all of the moving parts. I have this same image of my hip. After sleeping all night, I have the image that the fluid film layer is not as thorough as it is after the joint has been moved through a few cycles that would circulate the synovial fluid around the full perimeter the the joint surface. I have seen this spoken of in some studies discussing wear in MOM joints, but I do not know for sure if the image is correct. These studies proposed the hypothesis that MOM joints could be subject to this same issue of "start up" wear being greater than "warmed up" wear when movement cycles had circulated synovial fluid throughout the joint interface.
I am neither a medical person, nor a car mechanic, but hopefully I have clarified my own image of what is going on.
John