Hi Arc,
I think a lot of people on this website (who were under 55 or so) were told to wait as long as possible. I know I was (HR 6/02/10 45 yrs). I decided to wait only until I had to give up what I loved, which was pretty much anything FUN! My big passion, however, is horseback riding. I did not want to wait until I was "bone on bone" and sitting around. Why wait that long. You get out of shape (gain weight), your muscle tone deteriorates, you get depressed. All to gain only a couple more years at best? Like DirkV said, two or even three years is not going to make that much difference, usually, in medical field breakthroughs- for all the reasons he noted. But, I reasoned, 2 or 3 years could make a world of difference in my life! At only 45, I was not willing to stop my activities due to pain and discomfort- when it could be relieved with a HR! This sounds very harsh, but who is to know what could happen in my life in that time... cancer, accidents?? I would have wasted a good few years of my middle age sitting around waiting to get old enough for a hip replacement. How silly is this?
As it is now, I recovered quickly because I was still in fairly good physical shape when I had it done. Since I had a HR (as opossed to a THR), I still have plently of bone left for a revision when I need one. And I am enjoying some of the best years of my life again!! I am actually kind of angry that I waited even as long as I did. I'm thinking now that I should have done it about a year earlier.
If you are hurting as badly as it sounds like you are, even if it is only certain activities (the same was true for me). I would not wait. At least, not for the reason of being too young. Good Luck, Lu
PS. I, too was "crushed" at my hip OA news. I would even go as far as saying I felt almost suicidal at times. Being active meant everything to me. If I had only known it would work out like it did... Well, just know that you need not despair. That's what I love most about Pat's website!!!