I have had hip pain for many years and was diagnosed with bilateral dysplasia about 15 years ago but it was not followed up. I had just had the first stage of re-constructive foot surgery and had had DVTs and multiple PE's so the rest of my foot surgery was put on hold. Fast forward to a couple of years back and, in the absence of further surgery, my foot / ankle problems had progressed to needing an ankle fusion. My orthopaedic surgeon decided to go ahead with the surgery but use prophylactic LMWH injections. I was three months in a cast non weight bearing. During this time I found it very difficult to mobilise as my right hip was extremely painful and, despite the LMWH (which was stopped once I was mobile again) I quickly developed a massive clot (lower calf to groin). I am now on warfarin (possibly for life).
Following my ankle fusion my hip pain was investigated and I have 'a poorly formed acetabulum with lateral subluxation of the femoral heads'. The right is worse than the left. The report said nothing about joint space narrowing so I have no idea if there is any damage to the surface of the hip joint. I am being referred for either a bilateral osteotomy (PAO?) or a THA.
Researching on line it seems that the three indicators for a THR rather than a PAO are age (I am 50), degree of joint damage and a poor fit between joint and socket. I would prefer to preserve my own hip as long as possible so would rather have a PAO. A PAO also seems to give far fewer limitations post op. First of all though, I have the hurdle of my clotting problems to overcome.
I guess my queries are:
Have any 'older' people here had a PAO?
Has anyone had to make the choice between PAO and THA and which way did you go and why?
Has anyone else had to deal with issues of a thrombophilia and major hip surgery?
Who are the best surgeons for PAO in the Midlands (Stoke-on-Trent) area?