Well, where do I start!
Yesterday morning I spoke with Mr Treacy's surgical assistant who is excellent and very knowledgeable. She told me that as I have had absolutely no problems with my hip then likely there is nothing to worry about. She confirmed that I have a 97% chance of my Birmingham Hip lasting a minimum of 10 years
Mr Treacy has now performed 5000 BHRs and has done the most in the whole world! So he really knows what he is doing and what he is talking about. She explained about the metal ions and how research has shown that during pregnancy the ions are filtered through the placenta before reaching the unborn child and that so far no health problems have been documented relating to metal ions. Her concern was that my NHS surgeon was scaremongering me because he doesn't do this surgery himself, nor does he know enough about it or the research and he may well be comparing my Birmingham hip to other makes/models that are not quite so good. She mentioned the Duron resurfacing made by zimmer, apparently this is failing quite a bit.
So I saw my NHS surgeon. Politely chastised him for giving me heart failure on a Friday night which subsequently led to a difficult weekend and he did apologise. My metal ions are approx 10 times increased (just as you mentioned Nancy
He looked at my xrays again and said there is no denying Mr Treacy has done an excellent job. I argued the fact that surely because I have a metal implant then it is expected to have increased metal ions, he did not disagree with this, but felt it should still be checked out
He wants to send me for an MRI scan to have a look at the hip and this will avoid unnecessary radiation.
When I got home I phoned Mr Treacy's assistant again and she discussed all of this with him and telephoned me back. Mr Treacy feels there is absolutely nothing to worry about, he himself has no concerns especially as my hip is doing great. He feels my NHS surgeon is perhaps looking for problems that do not exist! He doesn't see the need for an MRI scan and feels this is wasted NHS expenditure. He says the MRI scan won't show anything up other than a good hip. He has said, however, that it would be useful for me to get a blood test done, either through my own GP or by going to one of his hospitals in Birmingham, to have the levels checked again and this will be recorded on my files. He doesn't need to see me, but from a research point of view it would be good to get this done. Also, although urine samples are good, there is a chance of it being contaminated and it also only shows what my body is excreting whereas they prefer a blood test which is more accurate and shows what is actually circulating my body.
So I've arranged to see my GP to see if she is able to organise this sort of blood test for me, if not then I will travel to Birmingham for it. I'm still undecided about the MRI scan. My NHS surgeon is writing a letter to Mr Treacy but goodness knows what he is planning on telling him and if Mr Treacy does reply I'm sure it will be an interesting one