Just wanted to post an update. On Friday, 10-8-10, i will have a revision to a THR to replace a 2-year old BHR. The reason is increasing pain in the joint, and the larger concern is metalosis by cobalt poisoning. The root cause for this resurfacing failure is improper location of the acetabular component. It is at an angle of 60 degrees, possibly very close to my natural angle before surgery. Many patients have been loaded with resurface acetabular cups at greater than 60. Due to this acute angle, and failure to adjust for this during the initial placement, my hip parts are 'edge-loading' a great deal of the time. This throws off metal ions, which are in my blood stream and have attacked the surrounding tissue. That dead tissue will have to be removed, but i am told it will rejuvenate over time. Ultimate faliure would occur if the metal attacked the bone, so we have to do the revision now. You can google cobalt ions in blood to read some of the other unpleasant effects of this (i.e. my ears are ringing as i write this).
Note: the miss-placement of the acetabular cup is the root cause for the "clunking" sensation so many BHR patients feel. I have beeen told that upwards of 25% of resurface patients experience this. The two parts want to be polar-aligned. When they are not, edge loading and ion discharge will result. Some number of the patients who experience this now (who knows how many?) will eventually have exceessive cobalt ion counts. When that is discovered, you are looking at either a revision of the acetabular, or a complete THR.
What can you do about this? New resurfacing patients can learn before surgery what angle the surgeon plans to place the acet. comp. The doctor should be very familiar with the risks of acute angle placement, and how to engineer this in correctly. The max angle of placement (i have been told) should be 40 degrees. This focus on acetabular component angle is relatively new to the doctors who are doing resurfacing. Am pretty sure it was not a concern of my doctor when he did my op 2 years ago. You should insist on intra-operative x-rays to verify the placement before the surgery is concluded. Annual followup tests, and a blood test for cobalt (not cheap) should be the norm for anyone is experiencing clunking or the feeling of movement in the joint.
If you elect to revise just the acetabular component, be aware that this is very similar to the original resurface operation. Whereas the newest technique for THR first-time placement involves an anterior approach, which is less invasive and easier recovery, going to a THR from a resurface, most of which were placed posteriorly, will have to use the same approach as the first time. In addition, the condition of the remaining original femoral component, even with a new acetabular cup, should be a consideration. That wear, or galling, of the two pieces has likely produced some amount of deformation of the femoral ball. How is that worn ball going to fit smoothly with a new cup? Ultimately, that logic was the reason i VERY reluctantly chose to have the THR. It was one of the toughest decisions i have ever made. I wiil be requesting and receiving the removed, worn cobalt pieces after my revision. I will let you know the results after i see them.
I apologize for the long post. This is a very deep subject. Patients who have received or are considering receiving a metal-on-metal hip resurface should know what they are 'walking into'.