Interesting discussion. I simply assumed that the pelvis was symmetrical and found 2 matching landmarks to make the horizontal ref line. Keep in mind that there is still the forward-facing (anterversion) angle, which is not easilly measured with standard frontal x-rays. The point about the funcitonal angle is interesting. I was super crooked with regards to the x-ray frame, when I go my 2 week x-rays. I think it has a lot to do with how tendor and swollen things are early on. So obviously using the x-ray frame is not a good reference line.
Horse - I think you'd have to make some significant changes in the gait to modify the functional angle to get away from a high angle. I think you'd get a lot of complaints from vairous body parts. I think you'd have to be constantly bent over, like the old man on the cover of Zeppelin 4. Actually, that would be anteversion, no you'd have to have your arse sticking out to one side all the time. That wouldn't work for bi-lats. I suppose you could swing your hips back and forth at each step, sexy!