Hi Lyn - here's information over ten years from the full 2011 Australian Registry as posted by Pat:
http://www.surfacehippy.info/pdf/aoanjrreport2011.pdfThe information over 10 years for women - cumulative, it adds in the previous years revisions. :
(from page 96 of the report)
Less than 50 mm in head size 0 years - 2.6 (2.1, 3.3) 1 year - 5.3 (4.5, 6.3) 5 years - 8.0 (7.0, 9.2) 7 years - 11.2 (9.8, 12.7)
So that means that at 1 year, 2.7% more were revised, at 5 years, 2.7% more were revised, at 7 years, 3.2% more were revised.
Greater than 50 mm in head size:0 years - 0.5 (0.1, 1.8 ) 1 year - 1.2 (0.5, 2.9) 5 years - 2.2 (1.1, 4.3) 7 years - 3.5 (1.9, 6.4)
So in this, smaller boned (and so smaller prosthesis) were revised at a higher rate.
Some things to keep in mind:
- The numbers were all ages rolled in together, there is data there broken down by age.
- The data included the now recalled ASR results, which significantly (17.9%) impacted women.
- The data covered all surgeons, does not identify surgeons with > 500 procedures, for example.
For comparison, here are the revision figures for a THR by head size:
(Pg. 73)
For heads < 32 mm1 year - 1.4 (1.0, 1.9) 3 years - 3.1 (2.4, 3.9) 5 years - 3.9 (3.2, 4.9) 7 years - 4.5 (3.7, 5.6)
For heads > 32 mm1 year - 2.0 (1.7, 2.4) 3 years - 5.7 (5.1, 6.4) 5 years - 8.6 (7.8, 9.6) 7 years - 10.9 (9.6, 12.4)
In comparison of HRs with THRs, at 5 and 7 years the revision rates became comparable.
Hope that helps.