I have been reading so much on this stuff over the past five years or so, that my poor memory is pretty taxed, but I will try to add to the discussion with what I think I remember, as long as you guys remember that I may not be remembering correctly.
There have been very rare cases where the actual devices have failed in the past, but it is incredibly rare. The two failures modes that I have seen pictures of are stems that have broken off of the inside of the cap, and beads that have pulled off of the back of the cups. Both of these are so incredibly rare that no one should worry about them.
Once you get past the risk of femoral neck fracture, usually in the first six months, failure (other than due to infection) is usually due to the component loosening from the bone. I have read of four things causing this:1. Sometimes instead of solid bone growing into the prosthesis, a fibrous material grows in that is not as strong as bone, and may eventually fail. 2. Wear particles cause the body to react with cells whose effects can eat away at bone, called osteolysis, causing loosening. 3. Bone necrosis (dying bone), possibly due to vascular issues. This would likely show up fairly soon. 4. Breakdown of the cement. This appears to be less of a problem with resurfacing, since the cement is under compression stresses, rather than shear stresses as with a THR.
Either component can come loose with time, but I think I read that Dr Gross felt that the femoral component was most likely to loosen over the long term, which is why he was motivated to develop the cementless cap. As many have pointed out, Mr McMinn's long term success rates would not show this to be much of a problem.