After spending hours, upon hours, of reading all the great posts, articles, videos, etc. I find myself now defending my decision to move forward with hip resurfacing. I am a 50 year old, medium build, previously active woman who as been struggling with pain for over 4 years. I had hip arthroscopy for labral tears/FAI Left- 5/14/12, R 8/27/12. The surgery and recovery was difficult and sadly my ortho found the my hips were much worse than the hip xrays revealed. I was never able to fully return to running (5ks, no marathons) and I recently left my job as a RN as I was simply unable to be on my feet for hours at a time. My ortho referred me to Dr Brooks (at the Cleveland Clinic) for hip resurfacing. My appointment which can't come soon enough is 1/10/14.
I was at a holiday gathering last night at my sister's house. One of the attendee's was a local orthopedic surgeon (spine only) in a large orthopedic practice. He overheard me explain hip resurfacing and stopped me mid-sentence. For 10 minutes he lectured me on why I shouldn't have a HR and instead proceed with a THR. He caught me off guard and could really only say that I thanked him for his concern and I understood the arguments but I felt I had researched the decision and felt comfortable with it. He then quoted the recent UK article and said "If this is such a great surgery, then why have so many surgeons quit doing it?.. Because it fails and patients end up with another surgery-the one they should had have to begin with, a THR".
Uggh....so happy to have found everyone here!