Tomorrow will mark exactly six weeks since the morning I got my right hip resurfaced by Koen De Smet. It has also been a bit more than two years since I had revision surgery on my left hip. For anyone who doesn't know the story, nearly four years ago an Argentine doctor botched his attempt to resurface my left hip. A year and a half later I went to Koen De Smet for the revision and his team fixed me up with a large ball ceramic on ceramic THR. Maybe I should mention that I am an active rock climber and after the revision I was able to return to a good level (for me) of climbing/bouldering in spite of the OA in my right hip.
I'm thinking my current condition should offer an interesting perspective on the differences between the two sorts of procedures (revision to a THR a la De Smet and HR). I guess the first thing I have to say about this, so far, is that the recovery from my HR surgery has not been any easier (objectively speaking) than recovery from the revision surgery. In fact, psychologically speaking, the new surgery has been more difficult than the revision, mainly because I was worse off before the revision surgery and afterwords, almost everything felt like improvement. This time around I wasn't so bad off before and I feel more heavily the weight of trying to recover from yet another hip surgery (three times in less than four years).
It seems the fact I have a lot of muscle around the hip made my surgery a bit tricky. When De Smet came to see me the morning after, he seemed kind of intense. He said (more or less): "You know, metal on metal is a procedure than can work quite well. However it must be done with absolute precision". Then he told me: "For your surgery I was lucky to be working with my colleague from Rome, who is one of the best surgeons in the world". Then he took out the post op x-ray of my hip and showed it to me with obvious pride. Later, when I asked De Smet's assistant, Bart, if he knew why my leg should feel sorer than it had after revision surgery he told me I had a considerable amount of muscle protecting the hip and this made it quite difficult to get a good cup placement. I recall my Argentine surgeon had complained about exactly this, after his attempt at HR. I guess I'm glad I went to the best this time.
At this point, I'm roughly at the same place of recovery as after the revision. After the revision surgery, I began to practice in my home climbing gym 5 weeks and 4 days after surgery. This time my first day in the gym was 5 weeks and 3 days post op. After sessions in the gym on Saturday and Sunday I´m ready to return for more training, tonight after work. Meanwhile, as before, I'm also going for some good hikes (around 5 miles), using trekking poles. That's where I was six weeks after revision. The one place I may be a little slower to recover at this point is walking unassisted. I still have a pretty good hip waddle, when I walk unassisted (especially if I try to walk quickly), but this is definitely improving each day now. Also, my leg feels pretty stiff, for example, when I get out of the car after the 70 minute drive to work, and it takes a bit to warm it up afterwords, but I really wouldn't say I am experiencing anything like pain (or even irritation) in the hip or leg.
Cheers
Tim Bratten