I think S&N have withdrawn sub48mm devices, although Dr Rogerson appears to be looking at 50mm plus.
The female issue isn't only about size, but a tendency for dysplasia and failures in that population where selection and surgeon experience are even more important.
I would expect the experienced surgeons to overcome this somehow, but it may take a long time, as we start to see many long term success results, as I hope we will, and as I hope to be!
But since this is a manufacturer withdrawal, not forced as I understand, then perhaps we will find them still manufactured but sold to a non Smith and Nephew company, and marketed under that co but only to proven experienced surgeons (or for training purposes), so S&N are disassociated and not liable. Or maybe that is too simplistic an approach.
I sure hope there is a 48mm size around for my left hip in future if and when the time comes!
DR ROGERSON thread
Be that as it may, as of June 3, 2015 we will no longer be able to perform BHR hip resurfacing in the female population at large or in males with femoral head sizes templated below 50 mm. I personally feel that this is most unfortunate for these younger patients, male or female, who want to remain extremely active.