I was told back in April (2021) that Dr. Ball no longer does hip resurfacing. This came straight from his PA in an email. Even if Dr. Ball does an occasional one every now and then, he actually prefers the THR over hip resurfacing anyway. He feels very confident in the new THR implants and feels the risk of revision is a bit lower with the THR. I would agree with him, except if you have a very experienced BHR surgeon do the operation. In the case of experienced high(er) volume surgeons, the data show a lower revision rate... despite more active and younger patients. AND... if anything does go wrong years down the line, you can be converted to a dual mobility THR... unlike getting a THR first, which can lead to higher risk during revision surgeries.
I was a patient of Dr. Ball's and planned on using him for hip resurfacing (BHR). The most experienced doctor in CA is Dr. Peter Callander for the BHR... which is the logical choice if you are over 6 foot tall or have a 48 mm or larger femoral cap. In fact, I am flying up to SF next Saturday to have my BHR surgery with him on Wed. Sept. 22nd. Dr. Callander has done over 1200 BHR surgeries and still does them on a weekly basis.
The Synovo device used by Dr. Pritchett with the highly cross-linked poly is too thick (according to Dr. McMinn, who invented the BHR and popularized hip resurfacing again). The extra thickness means that a little more bone is taken from both the acetabular cup and the femoral ball... two things that add to the risk of problems down the road.
Feel free to DM me if you have questions. Gary (Temecula, CA)