Agree with the other replies, particularly about listening to the THR guy. Surgeons who do not do resurfacing often (always?) advise against it, and the studies they cite are not even based upon failures of resurfacing. If you do a deep dive into all the articles on this website, and also on Dr. Gross' website, you'll know more than the other surgeons about survivorship, failure rates and their causes, etc. And is it really surprising that the non-surgical doctor told your you're not a candidate? Most folks here I've followed get pretty much all range of motion back if they work at it. Maybe not 100%, but pretty darn close.
One of the main benefits (amongst many) of the resurfacing is that IF you need a revision someday, you still have all your bone to work with. If you go THR now then a future revision is much more difficult and risky.
Dr. Brooks did my brother's hip (he lives in a Cleveland suburb), and Dr. Gross did mine as he is about a 3 hour drive from me. However, I prefer Dr. Gross' procedure because he uses a bone-ingrowth femoral component instead of cement. This appealed to me, as it is possible (though low risk) for cement to fail. But Dr. Brooks' track record is pretty awesome as well.
Good luck with your decision. Deciding on my first one was hard. Second one.......easy.