Category Archives: cemented & uncemented Hip Resurfacing

Hip Resurfacing articles about cemented and cementless devices

Is it Time for Cementless Hip Resurfacing? Dr. Julien Girard

Surfacehippy | Hip Resurfacing Alternative to Total Hip Replacement Posted on by
Read Complete Article by clicking below:https://www.surfacehippy.info/pdf/is-it-time-for-cementless-hip-resurfacing-Girard-2011.pdfAbstract

Background: Metal-on-metal bearing with cemented femoral component and cementless acetabular fixation is the current standard in surface replacement arthroplasty (RSA) of the hip. Because of concerns about the long-term survivorship of cemented stems in conventional hip arthroplasty, it seems logical to achieve cementless fixation on the femoral side with RSA. Questions/Purposes: The goals of this review were to evaluate clinical and radiological data reported from previously published cementless RSA series. In addition, we intend to review author’s preliminary experience with Conserve Plus cementless devices specifically assessing the clinical outcomes, the complications rate, the survivorship, and the metallic ions levels measured in follow-up.

Methods: A references search was done with PubMed using the key words “cementless

… Read the rest

Dr. De Smet begins uncemented hip resurfacing with the Wright C+ hip resurfacing device

Surfacehippy | Hip Resurfacing Alternative to Total Hip Replacement Posted on by
Dr. De Smet Begins Uncemented Hip Resurfacing

May 25, 2010

Dear Pat,

I indeed will start with the C plus uncemented.

I will cautiously start this and study this together with the University of Lille France.

Results only can be accepted if they are longer then 3-4 years. Nobody is there yet!! So again we have to be very cautious with results at this moment.

Greetz

KOEN

Koen De Smet

AMC Gent

Anca Medisch Centrum – Anca Medical Center GHENT

Hipsurgeon

Krijgslaan 181

9000 GENT

BELGIUM

Dr. Koen De Smet 3200 Hip Resurfacings to date *** ANCA-Clinic Kalverbosstraat 31A 9070 Heusden BELGIUM Phone: +(1)32 9 2525903 Fax: +(1)32 9 2526457 +1 for USA & Canada: E-mail: helpdesk@heup.be ANCA Clinic Website

… Read the rest

Uncemented Hip Resurfacing

Surfacehippy | Hip Resurfacing Alternative to Total Hip Replacement Posted on by
Uncemented Hip Resurfacing
  • Cementless Hip Resurfacing by Dr. Julien Girard 2012
  • What is the Best Bone Fixation Type by Dr. Gross 2011
  • Should You Have Uncemented Hip Resurfacing by Dr. Gross 2008
    •  
    Dr. Gross Interview by Patricia Walter Dec. 3, 2012 Columbia SCUncemented Hip Resurfacing and Update for 2000 Uncemented Cases by Dr. Gross 2012 from Surface Hippy Videos on Vimeo.
    … Read the rest

    Is it Time for Cementless Hip Resurfacing? Julien Girard, MD, PhD

    Surfacehippy | Hip Resurfacing Alternative to Total Hip Replacement Posted on by
    Updated 10/2/2014Read Complete Article by clicking below:https://www.surfacehippy.info/pdf/is-it-time-for-cementless-hip-resurfacing-Girard-2011.pdfAbstract

    Background: Metal-on-metal bearing with cemented femoral component and cementless acetabular fixation is the current standard in surface replacement arthroplasty (RSA) of the hip. Because of concerns about the long-term survivorship of cemented stems in conventional hip arthroplasty, it seems logical to achieve cementless fixation on the femoral side with RSA. Questions/Purposes: The goals of this review were to evaluate clinical and radiological data reported from previously published cementless RSA series. In addition, we intend to review author’s preliminary experience with Conserve Plus cementless devices specifically assessing the clinical outcomes, the complications rate, the survivorship, and the metallic ions levels measured in follow-up.

    Methods: A references search was done with PubMed using the key … Read the rest

    What is the Best Bone Fixation Type? by Dr. Gross

    Surfacehippy | Hip Resurfacing Alternative to Total Hip Replacement Posted on by

    What is the Best Bone Fixation Type?

    Dr. Thomas Gross 1/11/2011

    A Comparison of cement vs. bone ingrowthThomas P. Gross, M.D.

    • At 2 years of follow-up cemented and uncemented femoral resurfacing is equivalent.

    • Femoral cement failure is the most common late cause of failure in hip resurfacing (3% @ 8 years).

    • Wear-related failures with the Corin or Biomet implant systems are rare in my experience.

    • We have demonstrated that failure of bone ingrowth does not occur in a properly designed uncemented femoral resurfacing component (provided femoral neck fracture or osteonecrosis does not occur).

    • Uncemented fixation of implants in stemmed total hip replacement surgery is more durable at 10 years than cement, especially in young active patients.

    • Every patient who is a candidate for hip

    … Read the rest