Surgical Approach by Joint Replacement Institute of Los Angeles, CA
What are the differences between the posterior and anterior surgical approaches? Recovery is quicker with the posterior approach because no important muscle groups are sectioned. The posterior approach is also well-suited for patients who are large, well muscled or who require special techniques to implant the hip resurfacing socket. To improve stability and reduce the… Continue reading →
Dr. Mont Live Chat September 17, 2008
Updated 9/17/08 [Pat Walter Moderator] 7:58 pm: Welcome Dr. Mont. Thank You for giving your time [Chuck] 7:58 pm: How bad would bone spurs have to be to preclude someone from having a hip resurfacing? [Dr. Mont] 7:59 pm: For Chuck—Bone spurs on femoral neck are not a contraindication for resurfacing–but obviously each x-ray would… Continue reading →
Peter Kay Response to Metal Ion Level Test
Minimally Invasive Approach to Hip Resurfacing Surgery Dr. Bose 2008
John Williamson Insurance Appeal Letter at Surface Hippy
Ted Wilson RASR Jan 05 Dr. Antoniou THR MOM May 07
Dr. Su responds to recent Lancvet Article about failoure rates
Hip Resurfacing for Women by Dr. Gross 2013
Jane’s BHR Revision to a THR Failed BHR & Surgeon Experience
Explain the Different Type of Anesthesia by Dr. Michael Broder
Ross Peterson Bilateral Hip Resurfacing with Dr. Shimmin 2005
Dr. Mont Live Chat July 16, 2008
Updated 7/16/08 This is a transcript of a Live Chat in the Surface Hippy Chat Room with Dr. Mont on July 16, 2008 Welcome! You have entered [Hip Resurfacing] at 7:31 pm [Hip Resurfacing]: Dr. Mont has entered at 7:51 pm [L. Thomas] 7:54 pm: I am interested in hip resurfacing. I am having hip… Continue reading →