- The overall survival was 95.1% at 13 years
- Survivorship in men was 98.6% at 13 years
- Survivorship in women was 87.9% at 13
James W. Pritchett MD, 901 Boren Ave. #900, Seattle, WA 98104
Cross-linked polyethylene has much less wear than conventional polyethylene and
can used in a more bone conserving thickness of 4 mm. We have used it for hip
resurfacing since 2001.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a highly cross-linked polyethylene
acetabular component for hip resurfacing in patients under age 50. I posed 5… Read the rest
Smith & Nephew
Review by Patricia Walter
May 6, 2010
Introduction: Joseph M. DeVivo, President of Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics
Joseph M. DeVivo, President of Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics
By: John S. Rogerson, MD April 2015
We have received a number of inquiries in our office regarding the merits of
cemented versus non-cemented femoral head components in hip resurfacing
Bear in mind that my experience with hip resurfacing to date has essentially
been associated with the Smith and Nephew Birmingham hip resurfacing system as
designed by Drs. McMinn and Treacy.
The system utilizes a line to line fit … Read the rest
DynaMoM hip resurfacing device (Tornier) by J Girard, MD, MsC.
DynaMoM hip resurfacing device was introduced in France in 2008 and was first implanted at Lille Universitary Hospital by J. Girard, MD. Rationale for design The rational for the design was made according to clearance, the rugosity, the head diameter, the sphericity and the alloy process. DynaMoM design-included the extent of cement fixation, optimization of implant position, minimization of stress-shielding,
- Voluntary actions initiated to remove smaller size components and change Instructions for Use (IFU) following analysis of recent performance data
- No action required from patients; no change to current practice for patient follow-up care
- BHR continues to perform amongst the best hip replacements for the right patients
New Data Reinforces the Proven Safety and Effectiveness of the BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing System80-percent of US surgeons choose the BHR hip as it outperforms all other metal-on-metal resurfacing devices
MEMPHIS, Tenn., May 3 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — Recent new data(1) presented at this year’s American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) annual meeting reinforces the BIRMINGHAM HIP™ Resurfacing (BHR) System as a safe and effective hip resurfacing device. The multi-site study, performed
|*Gathered by Vicky Marlow Freelance Patient Advocate Volunteer Miami Orthopedic Conference 10/2007|
BHR 10 years of Data
The first BHR was implantedin July 1997 and it is unchanged until present day.