Hip Resurfacing Medical Studies 10 Year Mortality Rates of Hip Resurfacing vs THR Study 2013 20 year Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Biomet M2a-38 by Dr. Gross 2023 35 Year Follow Up for THR Patients 50 and under A Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position in Metal-On-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty Adoption of Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at Hospital for Special Surgery Analysis of Cement Penetration in Hip Resurfacing 2007 Asprin and Xarelto Provide Similar Protection Against Venous Thromboembolism Average Age of Joint Replacement Patients Dropped by 2 Years Medical Study Bone Mineral Density better with Hip Resurfacing than THR Causes of Early Failure of Hip Resurfacing Study 2008 Complications and mid to long term outcomes for hip resurfacing versus THR Study 2022 Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis Study Despite Economic Times, U.S. Demand for Total Joint Replacement Remains Steady 2014 April 2, 2014 Do Cysts prevent hip resurfacing by Thomas P Gross 2011 Does commitment to rehabilitation influence the clinical outcome of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty study 2010 Dr. Brooks Study of His 10 Year Results Hip Resurfacing Dr. Pritchett Discusses Hip Resurfacing and Follow Up of 270 Patients Excessive sporting activity may impair long-term success of hip resurfacing Excessive sporting activity may impair long-term success of hip resurfacing Femoral component size positively influences BMD change Medical Study Femur Neck Fracture Study by Dr. Amstutz Follow-up, revision parameters for metal-on-metal hip implants outlined Gait Study about Hip Replacement at Surface Hippy Hip Arthroscopy Tool to determine Hip Resurfacing Pain Source Hip resurfacing and reduced mortality By Jeremy Latham MA MCh FRCS(Orth) 2014 Hip Resurfacing and THR Patients Report Pain Post Op Study 2015 Hip resurfacing arthroplasty enables faster walking, longer stride length than THA medical study 2012 Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients aged under 40 years Study 2023 Hip Resurfacing As An Outpatient Procedure Medical Study Hip Resurfacing Compared to Total Hip Replacement Functional Outcomes for 2 Years 2012 Hip Resurfacing Devices Medical Studies Hip Resurfacing Femoral Neck Fracture Influenced by Valgus Placement Hip Resurfacing in Patients 60 Years or Older Hip Resurfacing in Patients Who Are Sixty Years of Age or Older by Dr. Mont et al Hip Resurfacing is Not for Everyone – Rush Medical Study 11/3/08 Hip resurfacing patients with groin pain report improved results Hip Resurfacing Using Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene Study 2016 Hip Resurfacing Viable for Patients 45 or Younger Study 2018 Hip Resurfacing when THR is not possible by Dr. Mont Hip Resurfacing-RHA functional results compared to THR Study 2023 HR Patients Improved General Health 6 months Post Op Study 2015 HR Patients Return to Sports 3 Months Post Op Study Joint replacement surgery patients benefit from reduced opioid use Low Volume Surgeons Poor Outcomes Hip Replacement Study Low-back Pain Vexed by Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head Medical Studies about Doctors and Experience Medical Study – Patients’ Perceptions of Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty Metal in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Wear Particles, Biology, and Diagnosis Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing in Patients 45 Years of Age and Younger at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Patients Under 30 Medical Study 2013 Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty implants did not increase cancer risk Mortality and implant revision rates Medical Study Neck Fracture Statistics Study NIH researchers study metal-on-metal hip implant lubricant No Link between metal hip implants and cancer study 2012 One-component revision of failed hip resurfacing Study by Dr. Pritchett 2014 Oral Bisphosphonates After THR Surgery Reduced Revisions Study Osteoarthritis Patients Survive Longer after Hip Resurfacing than THR 2013 Outcome dependend on experience – Dr. Shimmin Outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System Study 2016 Painful Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Study 2009 Patients Living Alone can be Safely Discharged and Sent Home After Surgery Patients Report Improvement in Quality of Life Hip Resurfacing Patients Who Live Alone Can Recover Effectively and Safely at Home Phonophoresis is the use of ultrasound to enhance the delivery of topically applied drugs Prevalence of associated deformities with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement Results of BHRs at 12 to 15 years – Mr. McMinn 2014 Return to Sports After Hip Resurfacing – is it Safe Study by Dr. Amstutz 2019 Revision Hip Resurfacing Patients Have Better Outcomes Than THR Revision Patients Similar outcomes for THR and Hip Resurfacing Study 2015 Sports After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty Study Study Compares Quality of Life of Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Replacement 2014 Study Finds 60% of Total Hip Replacement Implants Last 25 Years Study finds hip resurfacing offers clinical benefits over total hip replacement Study: People Who Are Socially Isolated Experience More Pain After Hip Replacement Study 2013 The Influence of Head Size and Sex on the Outcome of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing 2010 THR Revision Study at Surface Hippy THR Younger Patients at Higher Risk for Revision Surgery Tissue Damage from Metal-on-Metal Hip Women More Sensitized than Men to Metal in Hip Replacement Medical Study
